Addendum 2 BDC02-26/27 Blue Spring - Restroom Replacement

October 7, 2026   NOTICE TO APPLICANTS ADDENDUM NO. THREE (3)   Blue Spring State Park - Restroom Replacement DEP BID NO. BDC02-26/27                   TO BIDDERS AND PLAN HOLDERS ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT: PLEASE NOTE CONTENTS HEREIN AND INCLUDE, SIGNED, WITH YOUR BID SUBMISSION.   NOTICE   It will be required that this addendum be signed in acknowledgment of receipt and that it be included with your Bid when same is submitted to Logan Lee-Marple, Contracts Specialist, Bureau of Design and Construction, 3800 Commonwealth Blvd., MS #520, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000. Failure to do so may be grounds for rejection of the Bid.   _______________________________________ Signature of Contractor and Date   The following statements supersede & supplement the corresponding items in the specifications & drawings:   1. The plans call for a clear anodic finish, but the specified tubing sizes do not come in an anodized finish. Would we be able to provide them powder coated in an anodized silver color, using woven mesh material from EMS Supply instead?   Response: Contractor may use other aluminum option do not use powder coated steel.   2. What material are the benches in the changing rooms to be constructed of? The benches are identified as Fixture #19 on the fixture pages, which reference Sheet A-401; however, a material or description does not appear to be provided. Please clarify the required bench material and specifications. Response: The bench is CMU block with concrete top.   3. The door schedule lists fiberglass doors in 16 gauge 'stained steel' frames while the details and specification call for hollow metal at 14 gauge. Please confirm the door and frame material, the frame gauge, and what is meant by 'stained steel'   Response: The doors are fiberglass-reinforced polymer doors installed in minimum 16-gauge Type 304 stainless-steel frames with a No. 4 satin finish. “Stained steel” was a typographical error and has been corrected to “stainless steel.” The previous 14-gauge hollow-metal frame reference does not apply and has been removed.   Revised Sheets: A-302: Door and Frame Schedule and door/frame details revised to identify FRP doors and 16- gauge stainless-steel frames. A-501: Doors and Windows specification revised to identify FRP doors and minimum 16-gauge Type 304 stainless-steel frames.   4. PPG Aquapon is called out for interior floors on plans/finish schedule; however there is no information in the Architectural specifications (A-501) for fluid applied flooring, there is only a spec for Ceramic Tile – please clarify   Response: Epoxy flooring is required at the interior concrete floors. The drawings and specifications have been revised to provide a complete, seamless, slip-resistant, fluid-applied epoxy flooring system with an integral 6-inch-high cove base. PPG Aquapon WB is identified as the Basis of Design, subject to the manufacturer’s written confirmation that the selected system is suitable for horizontal concrete flooring in this application. A comparable complete resinous-flooring system approved by the Architect and FDEP may be provided.   Revised Sheets: A-102: Coating Systems Schedule and Room Finish Schedule revised to identify slip-resistant epoxy flooring and a 6-inch integral cove base. A-501: Fluid-Applied Resinous Flooring requirements added, including substrate preparation, moisture testing, primer, epoxy coats, slip-resistant aggregate, finish coat, and integral cove base.   5. There are no gutters/downspouts shown on the building – please confirm this is accurate. Response: Confirmed. Gutters and downspouts are not provided. Roof runoff will discharge at the building eaves onto the adjacent positive-drainage surfaces. Final grading shall direct runoff away from the building and prevent ponding adjacent to the foundation.   Revised Sheet: A-102, Detail 2 – Roof Plan: Note added confirming that gutters and downspouts are not provided and describing the roof-runoff and grading requirements.   6. Section 2/A-201 calls for the “West” wall to be waterproofed to 4” below grade. This elevation is labeled “South”. Please clarify which wall is being waterproofed and provide the extent of waterproofing on this wall and product to be used.   Response: The previous waterproofing note was associated with an earlier retaining-wall condition. Civil confirmed that the grading design uses slopes up to the building and walkway slabs and does not require retaining walls. Accordingly, no exterior wall is required to receive below-grade waterproofing under this condition. The conflicting waterproofing note and the associated retaining-wall, form-liner, and waterproofing requirements have been removed.   Revised Sheets: A-101: Floor-plan and site-interface information revised to remove the retaining-wall cond